David Brody

CBN News Chief Political Correspondent

Buy David's book
"The Teavangelicals"

Watch The Brody File TV Show Video

Read David's Bio

E-mail David Brody

Subscribe RSS

TwitterTwitter

Facebook Facebook

Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe to this Feed

View All CBN News Blogs

View All CBN Blogs


Questions about Romney after Distancing Himself from Mourdock's Rape Comments


Here we go again with comments by a Republican U.S. Senate candidate about rape. First it was Todd Akin in Missouri and now Richard Mourdock is getting slammed for comments he made in a debate.

Here’s what he said:

“I came to realize that life is that gift from God. And, I think, even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.”

Mourdock is getting ripped for saying that and Mitt Romney is distancing himself from the comments even though he supports Mourdock in the race.

Watch a report about it below and then get my analysis.

Stay in the know. Get The Brody File Weekly

Mourdock has since come out with a statement saying the following:

"God creates life, and that was my point. God does not want rape, and by no means was I suggesting that He does. Rape is a horrible thing, and for anyone to twist my words otherwise is absurd and sick.”

Romney’s campaign put out a statement saying the following:

“Governor Romney disagrees with Richard Mourdock’s comments, and they do not reflect his views.”

Look, let’s get real here okay? Mourdock wasn’t saying that it is God’s intention for women to be raped. Give me a break. Many liberals and Democrats are spinning it that way for political purposes. Mourdock was trying to make the larger point that God is sovereign and in control of ALL events and can use horrible situations like that and use it for good.

Now, admittedly he was clumsy in his delivery and he needed to say it a different way. Still, it’s interesting how the Romney campaign is so quick to dismiss Mourdock’s comments. The campaign really wants nothing to do with anything surrounding a pro-life issue and the minute liberals and the media make a big deal about the comments, the Romney campaign is quick to distance themselves. It's all political because they want to be stereotyped as right wing.

They did the same thing with Akin. Wouldn’t have this been a good time for Romney to point out that fact that all life does comes from God? Did he just have to dismiss Mourdock so quickly? Couldn’t the campaign make a distinction between the way Mourdock delivered those comments and his true intention?

What this should show conservative pro-life Americans is that Romney doesn’t really have any appetite to wade in to the abortion issue as president. He’ll do what he has to do to keep the base happy but it’s not an issue that a President Romney is going to stick his neck out on the line for or spend any political capital.

Print     Email to a Friend    posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:02 AM



Comments on this post

# RE: Questions About Romney After Distancing Himself From Mourdock's Rape Comments

David i think your right he's not going there. But its not a big surprise we knew that all along . He isnt the first choise of alot of us but he is it unless you want to find out what Obama meant when he wispered to Putin wait till after the election. After the election we who care about life have to not give up the fight its not all up to the president WE ARE THE PEOPLE it would be nice if he cared and was willing to stand up for the innocent Im glad Murdock is.
Left by kelly on Oct 24, 2012 12:49 PM

# RE: Questions About Romney After Distancing Himself From Mourdock's Rape Comments

Amen to kelly! Romans 8:28
Left by CCCooperAgency on Oct 24, 2012 3:00 PM

# RE: Questions about Romney after Distancing Himself from Mourdock's Rape Comments

Kelly, it is disheartening to see believers stretch so much to support the Mormon.
Romney's response or non-response is just a tip of the iceberg of what you'll get if he's President: inconsistency on the conservative cause. You are going to spend 4 years in regret.

And by the way CCCooperAgency, if Romney was a Christian, he would've used that scripture you quoted (Roman 8:28) to explain what I think Mourdock actually meant. But of everything he's good at faking, this is just too hard to fake.
Left by Sarah Jane O'Connor on Oct 25, 2012 4:40 AM

# RE: Questions about Romney after Distancing Himself from Mourdock's Rape Comments

Richard Mourdock said "even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something God intended to happen."

NO! NO! NO, Mr. Mourdock! God did not intend it to happen. Rape is a crime and a terrible thing to happen to any woman. But whatever the enemy meant for evil, God can use it for good. Romans 8:28 tells us: "We know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose.”

As we can see, Mr. Romney is uniquely unqualified to defend Mourdock, uniquely unqualified to be the standard bearer of the conservative cause and uniquely unqualified to be President. Apart from the fact that Romney as a novice will stumble on the job, whereas Obama already has the experience, the real choice in this election is between a bad Christian and a Mormon.
Left by Sarah Jane O'Connor on Oct 25, 2012 4:49 AM

# RE: Questions about Romney after Distancing Himself from Mourdock's Rape Comments

Also,I think they are baiting these prolife candidates with questions of rape.Its a real concern and controversy If you acknowledge that life begins at conception and as Murdock said really life begins with and is givin by GOD then regardless of how the conception occured isnt it still a life? Ask James Robison he was concieved when his father raped his mother. she choose life. I can see the other side its not a easy question. but its something that has to be approched honestly and how is this done if thier baiting them to twist their words and make politial points.
Left by kelly on Oct 25, 2012 12:49 PM