David Brody

CBN News Chief Political Correspondent

Buy David's book
"The Teavangelicals"

Watch The Brody File TV Show Video

Read David's Bio

E-mail David Brody

Subscribe RSS

TwitterTwitter

Facebook Facebook

Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe to this Feed

View All CBN News Blogs

View All CBN Blogs


Nebraska GOP Senate Primary Reveals The Tea Party Conundrum


Deb Fischer’s victory in Nebraska’s GOP Senate Primary is a great example of how the Tea Party movement hasn’t quite got its act together and is simply not all on the same page.

Tea Party stalwart Sarah Palin backed Fischer but Tea Partier Jim DeMint backed her challenger Don Stenberg. Meanwhile, Tea Party fan Mike Huckabee backed Jon Bruning along with Tea Party Express. It was a total Tea Party hodgepodge. Everybody was on a different page.

What we saw in Nebraska is one of the big inherent dangers for the Tea Party. How does an organic, bottom-up movement continue to increase in power if they are not all pulling in the same direction? Oh sure, they ALL want more constitutional conservatives elected, but they dilute their effectiveness if they can’t all march to the same beat WITH the same candidate.

This is the big conundrum for the Tea Party. At the national level, you have different factions within the Tea Party movement that don’t see the political landscape the same way. From a utopian standpoint, it would be wonderful to see all these groups (Freedom Works, Tea Party Express, Club For Growth, Americans For Prosperity, Tea Party Patriots, Jim DeMint’s PAC, Mike Huckabee’s PAC, and Sarah Palin’s PAC, and many others) all come together under one banner and get behind one single candidate in the primaries. Imagine the power in that!

The problem is it won't happen because not only do those groups have slightly different goals and priorities but the actual patriotic Americans who make up the Tea Party in the first place wouldn’t take kind to that sort of national consolidation. It would feel like an establishment group and in many ways, that’s exactly what the Tea Party is against.

The folks who make up the Tea Party will be the first to tell you that this type of competition (even among Tea Party backed candidates) is good for the system. And that may well be true but the larger issue remains. How can ALL these national Tea Party groups and PACS pull in one direction to affect systematic change?

The lack of cohesion could lead to a lack of political power.

Print     Email to a Friend    posted on Wednesday, May 16, 2012 2:30 PM



Comments on this post

# RE: Nebraska GOP Senate Primary Reveals The Tea Party Conundrum

The worse the President falters the more the Tea Party will come together. Nothing like a good scandal to get them together. Don't count the Tea Party out.
Left by KellieC on May 16, 2012 4:40 PM

# RE: Nebraska GOP Senate Primary Reveals The Tea Party Conundrum

As many people have probably noticed, there has been significant buzz and speculation flooding the blogs and news sites over this upcoming Friday's release of Facebook's IPO on the Nasdaq. Many financial pundits predict catastrophe and a second dotcom bubble bursting in the market, and expect Facebook's performance to mirror the struggles that have crippled recent tech companies that entered the market over the past 12 months (Groupon & Netflix). A few, on the other hand, see Mark Zuckerberg's darling of the Internet as a stock that could pop like Google did. Whether you are avoiding the IPO altogether, aiming to try and buy a few shares at the retail level or simply sitting on the side-lines observing Friday as a historic day for the tech industry (as the IPO will be the largest one released in history), May 18 will unmistakably see some interesting activity, with the following likely to occur. "Love your enemies; After all, You made them.”. Firozali A.Mulla DBA
Left by Mullar on May 17, 2012 1:04 AM

# RE: Nebraska GOP Senate Primary Reveals The Tea Party Conundrum

No, Scientists Aren’t Calling Conservatives Dumb.Conservatives seem to wrongly interpret the new science of ideology as a slight to their intelligence. On the contrary, research on the differences between liberals and conservatives has centrally focused on personalities and styles of thinking, which is quite a different thing.The idea is that there seems to be something about liberalism, with its openness to new ideas and new things, that does make liberals more science friendly, and more willing to change their minds over time. However, this is not at all the same as saying that conservatives are stupid. The personality trait in question, openness to experience, does tend to produce a higher verbal SAT score, but not necessarily a higher math score. And that makes sense—openness is about exploring (including through curiosity and reading), and seeing the world in a nuanced way, but not about raw intelligence. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA
Left by Mullar on May 17, 2012 9:56 AM

# RE: Nebraska GOP Senate Primary Reveals The Tea Party Conundrum

They are starting to eat their own, the Lipton-heads...
Left by mellow on May 18, 2012 3:00 AM

# RE: Nebraska GOP Senate Primary Reveals The Tea Party Conundrum

Tea Party voters wake up. If you have to choose between a business person and a life-long politician or lawyer on the ballet, chose the business person. At least they have an idea how the REAL WORLD works - and won't spend 40 minutes telling you something in circles that could be communicated to the point in less than 5.
Deb has my vote this fall. Remember to take your big shovel from your cattle ranch to DC. It's time to clean up the crap!!
Left by Tina in Nebr. on May 22, 2012 6:16 PM