Tuesday, September 22, 2015
I sat down recently with Robert Spencer, author of The Complete Infidel's Guide to ISIS, to discuss the terror group's plan for Rome. While the idea of ISIS conquering Rome may sound ridiculous, Quranic Muslims --not just in ISIS-- believe the fall of Rome must take place before the final battle against the infidel armies at Dabiq, Syria and the return of the Mahdi, the Muslim "messiah."
Oh, and ISIS also plans to behead the Pope. The interview is below.
Keep up with me at Facebook.com/dalehurdnews and on Twitter @dalehurd
Thursday, July 16, 2015
The only thing surprising to me about the terrible tragedy in Chattanooga is that it happened on a Thursday. Friday is Islam's holy day and the day that devout Muslims usually choose to offer their blood sacrifice to Allah by killing infidels.
Maybe the suspect, 24-year-old Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez of Hixson, Tennessee, just couldn't wait another day to be awarded his virgins for "martyrdom."
Amazingly, the FBI, according to news reports, initially said it was trying to determine whether this was terrorism or a simple criminal act. Or maybe it was "workplace violence” like what happened at Ft. Hood in 2009 when another Muslim went on a murderous rampage.
FBI, here’s a tip for you: This tweet 10 minutes before the shootings.
"O Americans Dogs soon YOU Will see wonders #Chattanooga #USA #ISIS. (This Twitter account has since been suspended)
Abdulazeez also wrote in his blog, "We ask Allah...to give us a complete understanding of the message of Islam, and the strength (to) live by this knowledge, and to know what role we need to play to establish Islam in the world."
Cue President Obama again saying another slaughter of Americans by a devout Muslim is "not Islam." I feel so much better. Do you think Muhammad, after beheading 900 Jewish men in Banū Qurayẓah, said, "You know, that isn’t Islam. I should stop this workplace violence."
The government's disinformation campaign about Islam started with George W. Bush's idiotic statement that 9/11 wasn’t about Islam. If you possess any common sense at all, you know you're being lied to and that Washington and big media are not on your side.
Why do the government and media continue to cover for Muslims? Here's one reason: Barack Obama’s 2008 election vow to fundamentally change America was about bringing to America the cultural Marxism that has been destroying the civic fabric of Europe; to weaken America and to make it multicultural and unexceptional.
This is the Left’s Utopia. It pushes down Christianity, traditional values, and patriotism while exalting non-Western cultures and religions. In Europe this has bred crime, civil strife, and tribalism. But because cultural Marxism is also the ruling orthodoxy in most big media newsrooms, reporters and editors couldn't be happier with this president and demolition job he's done to America.
This is why the government and media continue to minimize the threat of Islam and even encourage the spread of such an intolerant religion; one that teaches that homosexuals and unbelievers should be killed and treats women like property. Because the Left cares more about getting rid of Christianity and traditional values.
And this is not going to stop until enough Americans stand up and take their nation back.
Tuesday, July 07, 2015
Premillennial Dispensationalism is the dominant end times view among American Protestants today, thanks to the Scofield Bible, Billy Graham, most non-reformed churches and popular books and movies like "Left Behind."
But the Church was not always "pre-mill” and one criticism of pre-millennialism by its opponents is that it has given up on the culture and essentially left it for Satan while Christians retreat to live in caves, waiting for the Lord's return.
That description is part caricature, but there was a rather telling admission by a premillennialist and Baptist pastor after the Supreme Court's ruling last month making homosexual marriage a "constitutional right," one that seemed to validate my caricature of premillennialists. TheCripplegate.com author and Baptist pastor Clint Arthur wrote:
"It isn't easy for Christians to identify a silver lining to Friday's ruling that is worth celebration; unless you're a premillennialist."
"Whereas postmillennialism believes that Christ will return to earth when the gospel has triumphed over unbelief and conquered the globe, premillennialists aren't holding their breath. Premills teach that the world will slide from bad to worse until it is so irrecoverably bad that only Jesus can fix it. That will be his cue to return and establish a rule of peace, righteousness, and sanity in the courts."
"So, it is on days like this that I read with relish passages that others may dismiss as pessimistic. I prefer to see regress in society as a welcome sign that the Bible is accurate, and that Jesus is coming soon."
"Friday's ruling is yet another harbinger of what the Bible predicts will happen. The world will slide into a miry cesspool that no human can restore. And then Jesus will return to make all things new. Every SCOTUS faux pas is a step closer to that great day."
In an article entitled "Eschatology Matters," The American Vision, a Calvinist website that is not premillennial, said this about the article by Rev. Arthur:
"Every once in a while you get someone who just comes out and says it...premillennialism logically entails cultural surrender, and when cultural defeats happen, premillennialists secretly love it... "The embrace of, and near-celebration of cultural defeat is explicit on the lips and in the hearts of standard, conservative, Bible-believing, Christian premillennial leaders... They expect to lose the pro-life cause. They expect to lose the marriage fight. They expect to lose all our freedoms and biblical values in society. They expect to lose private property and free enterprise. They expect to lose the second amendment. They expect to lose the tenth amendment. They expect to lose the first amendment."
What did Jesus mean when He said in a parable, “Occupy (engage in business) until I come?"
As Christians are now sent to jail for holding to the very beliefs this government was founded upon, it is a crucial debate. Should we rejoice that what was once a Christian nation is now what it is?
I leave you with quotes from both sides of this argument, from the website Christian Civilization.
For cultural abandonment:
"You don't polish brass on a sinking ship." -- J. Vernon McGee
"God sent us to be fishers of men, not to clean up the fish bowl." -- Hal Lindsey
"I just can't buy their [postmillennialists'] basic presupposition that we can do anything significant to change the world. And you can waste an awful lot of time trying." -- Harold Hoehner of Dallas Theological Seminary.
For cultural redemption:
"David was not a believer in the theory that the world will grow worse and worse, and that the dispensation will wind up with general darkness and idolatry… It would be easy to show that at our present rate of progress the kingdoms of this world never could become the kingdom of our Lord and of His Christ.
Indeed, many in the Church are giving up the idea of it except on the occasion of the advent of Christ, which, as it chimes in with our own idleness, is likely to be a popular doctrine. I myself believe that King Jesus will reign and idols be utterly abolished; but I expect the same power which turned the world upside down once will continue to do it. The Holy Ghost would not suffer the imputation to rest upon His holy name that He was not able to convert the world." -- Charles Spurgeon
Wednesday, April 08, 2015
President Obama says global warming is a hazard to Americans' health, and has (surprise!) announced new rules for government and businesses to combat the problem.
Obama listed the dangers as wildfires (which apparently never existed before 1900), longer allergy seasons (really?) and rising cases of insect-borne diseases (Would he rather have an Ice Age? Climate history shows this can be arranged. It would kill the bugs).
Hey, Mr. President, here’s a hazard to Americans' health: no water. California is running dry because environmentalists cared more about a fish called the Delta smelt than about people. They prevented the building of a single new reservoir or conveyance system during a time when California's population doubled.
Thanks to environmentalists, 70 percent of California's rainfall washes out to sea every year.
California's Gov. Moonbeam, Jerry Brown, says the drought is proof that "climate change is not a hoax."
Really? Then what caused a 240-year drought in California that scientists say began in the year 850? Global warming from too many smoke signals?
The religion of environmentalism continues to victimize not just Californians but the world’s poorest. Author Steve Goreham says more than 1.2 billion people do not have access to electricity while hundreds of millions of others struggle with unreliable power thanks partly to the war on coal by Western leaders and Obama.
Power outages interrupt factory production, and schools and hospitals lack vital electrical power. Unreliable electrical generation means poverty, disease, and shortened lifespans. I've never heard a lefty say they cared a rat's patootie about how their controls on cheap energy victimize the third world.
It's because this is a war, and in war you have casualties. This is war on capitalism and individualism by the Control Freak Generation, better known as the baby boomers, the same people who want to outlaw Big Gulps and junk food, but not pot.
It's also some kind of pagan religious ointment for the psychic wounds of atheists, former hippies, and the guilty rich. Climate change regulations are the Control Freaks' best mechanism for controlling more of your life and damaging your life by making you poorer.
Always remember: another collection of control freaks called the Bolsheviks thought they were building Utopia, too.
Monday, March 16, 2015
...thanks to Sweden's crazy and unsustainable immigration policy.
Here are interview excerpts with the outstanding economic researcher Tino Sanandaji. Sanandaji has a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago and is a contributor to National Review. He is a research fellow at the Research Institute of Industrial Economics in Stockholm. His family is Kurdish and came to Sweden from Iran.
A new Ipsos poll shows that while most Swedes support their country's open immigration policy, only 10 percent think it works. Sweden leads Europe in per capita number of refugees welcomed into that country.
- Sweden’s experiment in massive immigration is destined to fail,
- Swedish leaders are hypocrites when it comes to immigration, because almost none of them live among immigrants,
- Sweden’s elite have formed what amounts to an “anti-racism cult” that has become a substitute religion,
- and "Speech suppression" when it comes to negative facts about Immigration has reached totalitarian levels.
This interview is from November 2014, so if figures cited by Sanandaji have changed, it’s not his fault.
I’m calling some of my interview excerpts with important Europeans, “Warnings,” because that is what they are; mostly raw interview material that I judge to be incisive and prescient. This is the stuff you should be hearing from the “mainstream media” but aren’t because of their bowing and bondage to political correctness and, in some cases, cultural Marxism.
Follow me on Twitter @dalehurd and at Facebook.com/dalehurdnews and on Instagram @dalehurdnews
Tuesday, March 03, 2015
I’ve decided to call some of my interview excerpts with important Europeans, “Warnings,” because that is what they are; mostly raw interview material that I judge to be incisive and prescient. This is the stuff you should be hearing from the “mainstream media” but aren’t because of its bowing and bondage to political correctness and, in some cases, cultural Marxism.
These will be, in many cases, dark visions of the future, because Europe, if it doesn't wake up, faces a dark future.
George Igler, Director of the Discourse Institute in London, is one of the most important voices about the Muslim radicalization crisis in Britain. Please share this link and, in that small way, help break the dangerous censorship by big media.
In this interview excerpt from the days after the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris, Igler said:
- Radical Muslims are de facto colonists,
- The British government’s answer to terrorism has simply been to take everyone’s rights away,
- European leaders should be held accountable for fostering homegrown Muslim terrorism,
- Laws against hate speech increase hate speech. So called “social cohesion” cannot be legislated successfully,
- Another terror attack in Britain or on the continent of Europe is "likely" this year.
As they say, "You’ve been warned."
Thursday, February 12, 2015
Fouad Belkacem, who I Interviewed in Antwerp in 2012, has been sentenced to 12 years in prison by a Belgian court for terror-related offenses and recruiting young men to fight in Syria. Belkacem, alias, "Abu Imran," was a leader in the Muslim group, Sharia4Belgium.
As you will hear in this two-part edited interview, Belkacem was completely honest about what his group wanted to achieve in turning Belgium into an Islamic state. This made him a public relations nightmare for those jihadist sympathizers who are trying to fly under the radar in Europe.
In part one of my interview, he says the label “democratic Muslim” is a contradiction in terms; that Sharia (he means the full Sharia—amputation for theft, stoning for adultery) is inseparable from true Islam; and he is very confident that the whole world will be brought under the control of Islam.
In part two, Belkacem describes the world under Sharia as something like heaven on Earth; without crime, hunger, or injustice.
Follow Dale Hurd at Facebook.com/Dalehurdnews, on Twitter @dalehurd and on Instagram @dalehurdnews
Friday, January 30, 2015
Here are highlights from my interview with Aymeric Chauprade, foreign policy advisor to the head of France's National Front party, Marine Le Pen.
After the Charlie Hebdo and Kosher Supermarket massacres, Chauprade posted a video online in which he warned that up to a million French Muslims are sympathetic to terrorism and comprise a “fifth column” in France.
He also said that France is at war with some, but not all, Muslims. For it, he was dismissed by Le Pen, although he told us he still has ties to the party.>
Le Pen is apparently trying to look kinder and gentler--some would use the term "politically correct"--toward Muslim immigration. And it has reportedly led to a schism in the leadership of the far-right party.
Here are highlights from our interview.
And here is the video in French that caused such a ruckus.
Monday, January 26, 2015
As Americans batten down the hatches for what could be an historic blizzard in the northeast, let’s revisit the recent claims made by those geniuses in the climate change movement and their sales force in big media.
“The End of Snow?” warned a New York Times headline last February. Yeah, right.
In 2000, the London Independent reported uncritically the dire warning of Dr. David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit of the University of East Anglia, who said that, in the future, "Children just aren't going to know what snow is."
Now the all-wise climate guardians have hedged their bets by telling us that climate change is the reason it is snowing so much. And if you don’t see the scientific brilliance in that flip-flop, I guess you just went to the wrong school.
I and others have called man-made catastrophic climate change a religion because it includes the elements of a paradise lost, sinners, sacrifice, atonement and an apocalypse. But calling it a religion gives it too much credit. It’s closer to a conspiracy theory on the Internet, unmoored from facts and consistency.
And, as for science, it has plenty of the political variety, propped up by dubious temperature readings cooked in a kitchen of faulty methodology or just made up.
A cool period of unknown duration is here. You were warned. Get your shovel and your woolies. And please, go make a lot of CO2.
Sunday, November 09, 2014
The Russian bear.
This is the classic 1984 Ronald Reagan presidential campaign commercial about the Soviet threat:
If the script seems strange, it was meant to counter Democratic presidential nominee Walter Mondale's pitch to voters that the Soviet threat was overblown and that President Reagan's tough approach was unnecessary and dangerous.
Mondale said he would talk to the Soviets and get them to negotiate. Democrats don't like to remember that back then, apart from a few hawks like Sen. Henry Jackson, a large swath of Democrats weren't bothered by the Soviets at all. Some could accurately be described as fellow travelers.
Reagan mopped the floor with Mondale, carrying 49 states and winning the most electoral votes in American history. When the Berlin Wall fell 25 years ago today, some of the same Democrats insisted Reagan shouldn't be given credit for it.
Now, about that bear. Thirty years later, the Russian bear has returned. One of my missions in Scandinavia this week will be to talk to military experts in a very vulnerable region about what some fear is a new Cold War.
But the difference between the Cold War in 1984 and the one in 2014 is the difference between Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Reagan was a rancher. Ranchers grab a gun when a bear is near.
The former community organizer Obama, with his sanctions, has simply poked the bear with a stick. The bear is angry and senses weakness.