Chuck Holton

CBN News Correspondent

E-mail Chuck

Subscribe RSS

Add to Technorati Favorites

Subscribe to this Feed

View All CBN News Blogs

View All CBN Blogs


General Crushed by Rolling Stone


President Obama has accepted Gen. Stanley McChrystal's resignation at the White House, naming Gen. David Petraeus as his replacement.

McChrystal was brought down by an article that appeared in Rolling Stone Magazine by Michael Hastings, a veteran war reporter who once brought his girlfriend with him while he was reporting on the war in Iraq, only to see her murdered in an ambush by Al Qaeda insurgents.

Most reporters that enter the war zone understand little of what they are seeing, because the military is such an arcane business.  This was certainly the case with Michael Hastings, who claims he is "surprised" by all the hoopla over his hit-piece in the Rolling Stone.

Was he out to get the general fired? According to Hastings, that was the furthest thing from his mind. But he did want to point out that the troops are increasingly frustrated with the restrictive rules of engagement being put on them by McChrystal and the Obama administration. 

This is news that Erick Stakelbeck reported way back in December, and I reported in April after returning from a month in Afghanistan. Our warriors are meat eaters, and they are tired of being fed cabbage.

When a journalist embeds with U.S. troops in the war zone, one of the "rules" we're given is that "every interview is on the record." Meaning, if someone says something to me, I can report it. Period.

But there's an unwritten rule, too. Sometimes things are said to give me context on what is going on that don't necessarily need to be repeated. An example is classified information - when you live with the troops, there are times when you will learn things that are classified "secret" for security purposes. But that doesn't give me the right to go out and publish that information.

On every embed, I've heard and seen things that, if reported, could have easily gotten military officers fired. That's because they are people, and in private conversations, they are apt to express their discontent about problems in their chain of command. 

They know that I'm a former military man myself, and feel comfortable sharing their innermost thoughts with me, because they trust me not to stab them in the back.  There has to be a level of trust between the military and journalists for the embed process to work right.

Michael Hastings took those kinds of private moments and used them for his own benefit, resulting in the downfall of the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan. While allowing a reporter from the Rolling Stone personal access of that kind to Gen. McChrystal represents a huge mistake by the General and his staff, it also portends poorly for any journalist who wants to embed in the future.

Michael Hastings' Rolling Stone may have crushed the General, but it will keep rolling and hurt the process of news reporting from the war for many years to come.

Print     Email to a Friend    posted on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:24 PM



Comments on this post

# RE: General Crushed by Rolling Stone

The Rolling Stone article was a - hit piece. If it wasn't why did he bring up the stuff about defending Pres. Bush's statement on the end of significant fighting in Iraq, his oversight of prison's there and the silver star incident. The reporter is making statements. If it had been part of the interview he would have sited responses or said, when asked I got "No comment."

He was the fly on the wall catching men under tremendous pressure keeping the atmosphere light. For example, McCrystal's response to a text from the US Ambassador and a staffers crud comment. They were not directed to the reporter. Here's an example of how this works. In the 80's the team to beat was the 49ers, the QB was Montana, headcoach Bill Walsh. Walsh would send a play in and sometimes Montana would say in the huddle "What is the crazy old man thinking?" We were not told he then called his own play.

Who said "they kicked the President's ass"? He quotes quotes no one! He sold a lot of magazines.
Left by Anonymous on Jun 24, 2010 4:57 PM

# RE: General Crushed by Rolling Stone

Does McChrystal think deserves any more privelege than did General MacArthur? As a general you may be invited to give your opinion at an appropriate time and to an appropriate audience, but once the orders are given it is your duty to either follow those orders or get out and to keep your mouth shut! It's amazing that McChrystal didn't learn that lesson before rising to the rank of general. That rule also goes for employment in the private sector. What the boss says goes, end of discussion. Thats the way of it.
Left by joelang60 on Jun 24, 2010 5:58 PM

# RE: General Crushed by Rolling Stone

I think it's important to note that Andrea Parhamovich, Hasting's fiancee, not girlfriend, was in Iraq working for the National Democratic Institute. Based on a Washington Post article I found, she had dreams of working with "a presidential candidate on foreign affairs." She studied political communication. You make her sound like a girlfriend that just tagged along. This is simply not true. She knew the dangers associated with working and serving in Iraq. Thought it was important to clear this up.

Also, I think its imperative that journalists present facts true and straight. While a degree of censoring is inevitable, and required when information is top secret, a journalist must present things the way they truly are. I won't assume Hasting's intentions were harmless, but I do think you have to report on things without the fear of burning bridges. Journalism requires truth.

Here's the WP article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/19/AR2007011900307.htm
Left by Scott J. on Jun 25, 2010 11:41 AM